Contingency Management Interventions for HIV, Tuberculosis, and Hepatitis Control Among Individuals with Substance Use Disorders: A Systematized Review

Authors
Evan S. Herrmann, Alexis K. Matusiewicz, Maxine L. Stitzer, Stephen T. Higgins, Stacey C. Sigmon, Sarah H. Heil
Peer-Reviewed Article
January 2017
View the resource

Headline

Contingency management interventions promote the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of HIV, tuberculosis, and hepatitis in individuals with substance use disorder (SUD).

Background

Individuals with SUD are more likely to have co-occurring infectious diseases, such as hepatitis, HIV, and tuberculosis. Contingency management is an effective treatment for SUD. This literature review analyzed the breadth of studies available on contingency management and its effectiveness when applied to populations with SUD and HIV, tuberculosis, or hepatitis.

Findings

This literature review included 23 studies measuring contingency management programs in various treatment settings with different incentive structures. Rewarded behaviors related to: (1) prevention activities, such as receiving vaccinations for Hepatitis B; (2) targeting diagnosis activities, such as returning to a clinic within a required window for provider reading of tuberculosis skin test results; and (3) treatment activities, such as medication adherence among people diagnosed with tuberculosis or HIV. In 85% of the studies reviewed, contingency management improved adherence to medical services related to prevention (45%), diagnosis (54%), and treatment (20%) activities related to HIV, tuberculosis, and hepatitis, when compared to control groups.

Policy/Program Takeaways

Contingency management can be a valuable intervention for boosting adherence for preventive services, diagnostic tests, and treatment for HIV, tuberculosis, and hepatitis among people with SUD. Public health leaders and providers can use this review to apply contingency management to existing SUD programs seeking to improve outcomes for infectious disease.

Posted to The Playbook on
Level of Evidence
Strong
What does this mean?